| Lectio altera |
|---|
| Ex Commonitório primo sancti Vincéntii Lerinénsis presbýteri (Cap. 23: PL 50, 667-668) |
|---|
Christianæ religionis dogmatis profectus
Nullúsne in Ecclésia Christi proféctus habébitur religiónis? Habeátur plane, et máximus.
Nam quis ille est tam ínvidus homínibus, tam exósus Deo, qui istud prohibére conétur? Sed ita tamen ut vere proféctus sit ille fídei, non permutátio. Síquidem ad proféctum pértinet ut in semetípsum unaquǽque res amplificétur; ad permutatiónem vero, ut áliquid ex álio in áliud transvertátur.
Crescat ígitur opórtet et multum vehementérque profíciat tam singulórum quam ómnium, tam uníus hóminis quam totíus Ecclésiæ, ætátum ac sæculórum grádibus intellegéntia, sciéntia, sapiéntia, sed in suo dumtáxat génere, in eódem scílicet dógmate, eódem sensu eadémque senténtia.
Imitétur animárum relígio ratiónem córporum: quæ licet annórum procéssu números suos evólvant et éxplicent, éadem tamen quæ erant pérmanent. Multum ínterest inter puerítiæ florem et senectútis maturitátem; sed iídem tamen ipsi fiunt senes qui fúerant adulescéntes; ut quamvis uníus eiusdémque hóminis status habitúsque mutétur, una tamen nihilóminus eadémque natúra, una eadémque persóna sit.
Parva lacténtium membra, magna iúvenum, éadem ipsa sunt tamen. Quot parvulórum artus, tot virórum; et si qua illa sunt quæ ævi maturióris ætáte pariántur, iam in séminis ratióne prosérta sunt; ut nihil novum póstea proferátur in sénibus quod non in púeris iam ante latitáverit.
Unde non dúbium est hanc esse legítimam et rectam proficiéndi régulam, hunc ratum atque pulchérrimum crescéndi órdinem, si eas semper in grandióribus partes ac formas númerus detéxat ætátis quas in párvulis Creatóris sapiéntia præformáverat.
Quod si humána spécies in áliquam deínceps non sui géneris vertátur effígiem aut certe addátur quíppiam membrórum número vel detrahátur, necésse est ut totum corpus vel intércidat vel prodigiósum fiat vel certe debilitétur: ita étiam christiánæ religiónis dogma sequátur has decet proféctuum leges, ut annis scílicet consolidétur, dilatétur témpore, sublimétur ætáte.
Sevérunt maióres nostri antíquitus in hac ecclesiástica ségete tritíceæ fídei sémina: iníquum valde et incóngruum est ut nos eórum pósteri pro germána veritáte fruménti subditícium zizániæ legámus errórem.
Quin pótius hoc rectum et cónsequens est, ut, primis atque extrémis síbimet non discrepántibus, de increméntis tritíceæ institutiónis tritícei quoque dógmatis frugem demetámus; ut, cum áliquid ex illis séminum primórdiis accéssu témporis evolvátur, et nunc lætétur et excolátur.
| | Second Reading |
|---|
| An instruction by St Vincent of Lérins |
|---|
The development of doctrine
Is there to be no development of religion in the Church of Christ? Certainly, there is to be development and on the largest scale.
Who can be so grudging to men, so full of hate for God, as to try to prevent it? But it must truly be development of the faith, not alteration of the faith. Development means that each thing expands to be itself, while alteration means that a thing is changed from one thing into another.
The understanding, knowledge and wisdom of one and all, of individuals as well as of the whole Church, ought then to make great and vigorous progress with the passing of the ages and the centuries, but only along its own line of development, that is, with the same doctrine, the same meaning and the same import.
The religion of souls should follow the law of development of bodies. Though bodies develop and unfold their component parts with the passing of the years, they always remain what they were. There is a great difference between the flower of childhood and the maturity of age, but those who become old are the very same people who were once young. Though the condition and appearance of one and the same individual may change, it is one and the same nature, one and the same person.
The tiny members of unweaned children and the grown members of young men are still the same members. Men have the same number of limbs as children. Whatever develops at a later age was already present in seminal form; there is nothing new in old age that was not already latent in childhood.
There is no doubt, then, that the legitimate and correct rule of development, the established and wonderful order of growth, is this: in older people the fullness of years always brings to completion those members and forms that the wisdom of the Creator fashioned beforehand in their earlier years.
If, however, the human form were to turn into some shape that did not belong to its own nature, or even if something were added to the sum of its members or subtracted from it, the whole body would necessarily perish or become grotesque or at least be enfeebled. In the same way, the doctrine of the Christian religion should properly follow these laws of development, that is, by becoming firmer over the years, more ample in the course of time, more exalted as it advances in age.
In ancient times our ancestors sowed the good seed in the harvest field of the Church. It would be very wrong and unfitting if we, their descendants, were to reap, not the genuine wheat of truth but the intrusive growth of error.
On the contrary, what is right and fitting is this: there should be no inconsistency between first and last, but we should reap true doctrine from the growth of true teaching, so that when, in the course of time, those first sowings yield an increase it may flourish and be tended in our day also.
|
| Responsorium |
|---|
| Deut 4, l a. 2 a; Io 6, 63 b |
|---|
℟. Israel, audi præcépta et iudícia, quæ ego dóceo vos:* Non addétis ad verbum quod vobis loquor, neque auferétis ex eo.
℣. Verba quæ ego locútus sum vobis, Spíritus sunt et vita sunt.* Non addétis.
| ℟. Listen, O Israel, and take note of the laws and customs which I am teaching you.* You must add nothing to what I command you, and take nothing away from it.
℣. The words I have spoken to you are spirit, and they are life.* You must add nothing to what I command you, and take nothing away from it.
|